9
in Denmark to pass more sovereignty to the European
Union.
The vote was first of all a no-confidence vote to the
Danish parliament and Prime Minister Lars Loekke
Rasmussen in particular. Interestingly, the majority of
the Danes are positive when it comes to the European
Union (the Danes want membership of Europol); but it
annoys many Danes that
a self-appointed elite believes they know what is best for Denmarkwithout asking
them directly.
The outcome of the Danish referendum may not have
any direct significance for the European Union (it is
neither an issue in Brussels nor in Strasbourg). On the
other hand, this is a message to Berlin and other
European capitals that the “European idea” is still not
deeply rooted, at least not when it comes to deeper
integration. In many small member states, an
increasing number of voters are worried about giving
up sovereignity.
This may also have something to do with
Chancellor Merkel. In 2015, Mrs. Merkel may finally
have shown a capacity to act; but her style has often
been highly autocratic. Today, Mrs. Merkel ignores that
she is Chancellor in a country where the constitution
was based on West Germany (Mrs. Merkel is from East
Germany). Even though Mrs Merkel may have all the
“politically correct” answers, she cannot commit the
entire European Union alone. Such commitment has to
be based on democratic rules. If Mrs Merkel does not
recognise this important difference, she risks alienating
many member states. The failure of the political elite to
listen to the voters risks creating tensions in Europe in
2016, which is also an important part of the
2016 Outlookon page 17.
China – Devaluation is now an official part of the
strategy; supply-side economics is on the rise
Until August 2015, Chinese policymakers abstained
from using the yuan to create growth. Beijing is very