Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  28 / 61 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 28 / 61 Next Page
Page Background Insight Perspectives

27

university students never study abroad, but particularly

among higher middle class parents, who have the

economic ability to offer their child a foreign education,

there is a growing feeling that something is

fundamentally wrong in Chinese schools, even though

students perform brilliantly in PISA tests.

A Hurun Report from 2014 found that rich Chinese

investors quoted the quality of education as their top

reason for emigrating (21 per cent), closely followed by

environmental pollution (20%), and food safety (19%).

According to the report ,

"[t]he average age at which

China’s millionaires send their children abroad to study

is 18. Among the children of the super-rich, the average

is lower, at just 16 years of age."

The discontent of the super-rich is only the tip of the

iceberg. For decades experts, teachers, and parents

have criticized the highly competitive Chinese school

system for putting too much pressure on the students,

for relying on rote learning, for killing children's

creativity, and even for "stealing their childhood", as it

is often expressed. Students who are sent abroad at a

younger age will be under less pressure from the

Chinese national university entrance exam, the

notorious gaokao that is the driver behind practically all

teaching activities in the Chinese education system.

This gives parents more freedom to place their children

in those alternative schools and kindergartens that are

no

w popping up all over the country .

Middle class parents' enthusiasm for Western, liberal

education – either in China or abroad – does not only

grow out of their concern for the children's well-being.

They also believe that creativity, curiosity, and an

independent and explorative mindset will be crucial in

the future job market as China is moving toward the

high end of the value-added chain. So paying the high

tuition fees of foreign universities is primarily seen as

an investment in the family's future. Partly for this

reason, several foreign actors have discovered the

economic and academic potential in being present in

the field of higher education inside China itself.

Prominent examples of different models are the

University of Nottingham's campus in Ningbo ,

the

China Europe International Business School

in Shanghai, and

the

Sino-Danish Centre for Education and Research

in

Beijing.

Will they come back?

Right from the first students were sent out in 1978, the

Chinese government has been concerned about

whether they would ever return after graduation.